Let's look at these three passages of the Bible.
Matthew 19:27-29
Then Peter said in reply, “See, we have left everything and followed you. What then will we have?” Jesus said to them, “Truly, I say to you, in the new world, when the Son of Man will sit on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel. And everyone who has left houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or lands, for my name’s sake, will receive a hundredfold and will inherit eternal life."
As theorized in other blog posts, Jesus seems to refer to his teaching with a numeral correspondence of 100. The number 100 seems to correspond to Christ's teaching in the Parable of the Sower and in other parts of the Gospels, as opposed to 60 corresponding to wisdom of Solomon (and 60 men of Israel and 60 Queens in Song of Solomon), and 30 corresponding to Jonah (likely related to the "Sign of Jonah").
Most people have interpreted this vaguely, that being prepared to leave anything behind for Christ will bring some kind of vague reward. But Jesus was smart, and able to do miracles involving complex healing and therefore knew complex concepts in biology and anatomy. He knew exactly what He wanted to say. The number 100, instead of some vague "many" or "much", was used for a specific purpose. Many of the apostles and disciples did not own lands (because if they did, they left their land anyway), but traveled and preached the gospel until being killed / martyred. Many traveled to distant foreign countries, and preached while owning no land, and then died. What then did Jesus mean by gaining exactly 100 times as many lands?
Some interpret this and said that the apostles were the only ones given this charge. However, the apostles were definitely not the only ones that this and the following passages apply to. Easily read that Christ used phrases in these passages like "everyone", "all", "no one...who will not receive".
According to the idea in the previous posts about the Parable of the Sower, 30, 60, and 100 refer to variants in a multiverse. Copies. However, this means that not only those specific amounts of copies/variants could be used in this universe, but that they may have come from, or are doors to, exactly 30 and 60 and 100 other alternate universes. Let's read further, to study the other two passages.
Mark 10:28-30
Peter began to say to him, “See, we have left everything and followed you.” Jesus said, “Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or lands, for my sake and for the gospel, who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions, and in the age to come eternal life."
According to previous posts, the Gospels seem to be each alternate timelines or alternate universes, that are intertwined with each other. (Something like: Matthew -> King, Mark -> Sage, Luke -> Immortal Sage, John -> Deity.) Jesus probably preached similar things in similar ways in each alternate timeline. Notice that in Mark's version of the passage, the hundredfold or 100x is mentioned specifically again.
Notice that the phrase "hundredfold now in this time" is used. Access to the 100 alternate universes, bringing in parts or images (or lower dimensional shadows) of them to the current universe, but also those 100 universes being potentially accessible if Behemoth and Leviathan direction are learned.
The way Jesus speaks seems to indicate that the 100x refers to copies or alternate universes, of the current universe that the disciple inhabits. Also ask, how can there be exactly 100 times as many as what is exactly had now? Doesn't there need to be an original, or something that is multiplied by 100?
Let's look at this last passage and spot the differences.
Luke 18:28-30
And Peter said, “See, we have left our homes and followed you.” And he said to them, “Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or wife or brothers or parents or children, for the sake of the kingdom of God, who will not receive many times more in this time, and in the age to come eternal life.”
How can someone have many times more houses, owning them, without there being 100 more houses to own? If someone interprets this in another way, I would ask how disciple could own a house in which they're staying as a visitor. And why would a disciple have many houses, if one, two, or few houses are most likely the case of shared ownership?
A major difference in Luke's version is the word "wife". How a single disciples have many wives? It seems to say that many wives will be gained "in this time/age", not just one wife per age. If alternate wives exist in alternate universes, then this verse makes much more sense upon interpretation. If some alternate selves each have one wife, then it is as if a man is already married in each of those alternate universes.
It is possible to have many children, but how is it possible to gain more parents? How can someone have more than 2 parents? If each alternate universe contains another pair of parents, then that interpretation is a natural fit.
The absence of the specific number 100 is noticeable in Luke's version. But it makes much sense when Parable of the Sower is considered. In Matthew and Mark, the number 100 is the maximum of the Parable of the Sower. In Luke, the Parable of the Sower's maximum is not 100, but it is 100 times or hundredfold. To clarify the maximums of the POS versions: consider the two numbers: 100 units vs some number Nx100 units. The number "N" is multiplied by 100, which is the meaning of 100 fold, and so can obviously be more than 100, if N = 2 or more. If the maximums of the Key Parable, the Parable of the Sower, differ in Matthew/Mark vs in Luke, then it is reasonable to think that the multiplier of these three passages, which are derivative teachings from the key teaching in the versions of the Parable of the Sower, would differ. The accessible number of alternate timelines/universes would differ, between Matthew/Mark (POS 100 max), and Luke (POS 100x), because some explicit teachings in those timelines may have differed, even if all the teachings were available if looking hard enough.
I'm not saying that Matthew's and Mark's gospel capped at a sort of power level of 100 max. I'm saying that their versions of the key parable (POS, parable of sower) have different introductory caps / maximums, and that later teachings from the key parable (POS) may extend this 100 max later in later teachings in Matthew and Mark after the POS introductory teaching. But their 2 passages we did read above, being after POS in their respective gospels, may build upon the foundations of the initial 100 max cap of their POS versions. Whereas instead the passage of Luke's may have a hundredfold or 100x as Luke's POS starting max or cap and build from there in later teachings in Luke's gospel, to possibly a higher number than 100x (which is pollaplasiona in the Koine Greek of Luke 18:30, rather than (and perhaps building in teaching from) ekatontaplasiona in Luke's version of POS).
Matthew 12:39, Matthew 16:4, and Luke 11:29 may indicate that those two timelines / (alternate) universes were given only the Sign of Jonah (perhaps explicitly), but the timeline / universe of Mark may have been given no explicit sign (Mark 8:12). And John's Gospel's alternate universe / timeline may have been given many signs (John 4:48, John 2:18-22 (perhaps a specific type and duration of resurrection differing from other resurrections), John 11:47, John 2:11, John 12:37, John 20:30). If "sign" is a specific unique concept, then that might be at least one difference between gospel versions, although the Gospel versions might involve intertwining or interwoven timelines, (as well as evidence of "timeline / universe hopping" and bringing and sending things and data between timelines and universes like the three passages above may describe) so it may be difficult to separate some of the timelines and universes completely or say something like "timeline A vs timeline B".