In terms of
gestalts, you could think of a conicity like this:
A 4D positive gestalt of perception is overlayed onto a 4D object in the kono side, shown in the above example image on the left side of the conicity. This makes more definition. The 4D object becomes more definite, because perception or positive gestalt is on one possible 4D object (like a 3D object persisting in time) out of many possible 4D objects. If the 4D object grows or rolls in the conic path, it can gain more 4D cross-sections and become a 5D object perceivable as a 5th Jhanic Mass, as shown in the middle of the conicity in the image above. There are 5D objects, that is, multiple overlapping 4D cross-sections, which are not perceivable to vision, because there aren't enough 4D cross-sections yet - like a 5D object that is too small to see or sense because it doesn't yet have enough 5D mass.
You may think imagining an object goes something like this:
(The oneiric or imagined space is denoted by a "hat" on its corner.)
However, that is much too simplistic.
If each moment-cube represents a moment as the shortest possible unit of time, a moment being even shorter than a micro-second, then what would happen during the example above? The green apple would not be perceived if it only appeared for a moment! Could you notice something that blinked into reality for a millisecond? Then also, imagined/oneiric objects need to be in perception for a sufficient duration to be noticed or perceived. Then how many moments would the green apple need in order to be perceived? Sky Darmos (in his book The Complete Guide to Quantum Gravity: Features Similar Worlds Interpretation, Space Particle Dualism, Charge Mass Dualism, Entropic Expansion, Chromogravity, Electrogravity and Conscious Set Theory) wrote that ~ 50 ms (milliseconds) are needed for one perceivable frame of consciousness. He also wrote that ~ 25 ms are needed for one subconscious frame. Grinberg-Zylberbaum wrote that ~ 50 ms are needed for one frame of consciousness also. They both imply that ~ 50 ms are needed for either a physical or an imagined/oneiric object to appear to consciousness. (This also means that 4D and 5D objects may exist that are not regularly perceivable to humans.) Therefore, enough moments (a moment as the smallest unit of time, if a second was repeatedly divided) are needed to fill ~ 50 milliseconds so that an imagined or oneiric object can be perceived by vision. So, imagining an apple may look something more like this:

You can go back and read Chapters 4-6. The images in those chapters should now make a lot more sense.
This image from
Chapter 4 now makes sense from what we learned about 5D objects. The blue and green and yellow moments are interacting with the main timeline (
OSP) but their contents are not yet being perceived. They don't have
enough interacting moments. The blue, yellow and green have under or less than 50 ms worth of moments.
OR they have over 50 ms of moments
but they have
gaps between moments (moment-cubes) so that there is not one continuous row of moments equalling 50 ms.
Let's look at some more pictures that were near to the end of
Chapter 6, that make much more sense with what we've learned so far:
This now can be described as a 5D object that is nearby but is not yet noticeable to perception.
The 5D object is then in the sono side of the conicity. It is more indefinite and doesn't have enough 5th Jhanic Mass in perception: it has too much
indefinition to be perceived, and it is not yet compressed into a 4th Jhanic Mass or 4D object in perception's timeline (
OSP). The 5D object can be thought of as "being brought in" or "being summoned or manifested into" perception. It is becoming more definite from its former indefinite position.
(Not from Chapter 6, but derived from the former image.) This shows that OSP, perception, the brain, and consciousness, can be thought of as in the indefinite sono part, if the 5D object's point of view has itself as a definite object and your brain or gestaltic area of consciousness as a more indefinite object.
The above image shows the (pyramid-shaped) 5D object (a 4D row of 3D moments, and the 4D row is curled for/in 5D). It interacts with perception, but doesn't have enough moments interacting to be perceived.
This image from Chapter 6 now is obviously showing the pyramid-shaped 5D object gaining itself 4th (and 5th) Jhanic Mass because more moments are interacting. What changed? Possibly the bottom 4D row (shown with a brain in it) changed its 5D curl, or the 5D object's 4D row changed its 5D curl -- or both changed their 5D curls. These are just some options for what can change.

The image above shows the 5D object gaining enough 4th and 5th Jhanic Mass to form a conicity, and enough to be interacting with OSP forwards in time. Beforehand, the 5D object would have been too indefinite. Beforehand, the brain in OSP could even be thought of as being in the 5D object's sono (see the earlier corresponding image), but now the conic trajectories have aligned, the 4D rows (4D cross-sections) have overlapped in 5D (the brain's and 5D object's aligned 4D row length being related to ~ 50 ms or longer for (a single frame of conscious) perception), for 5th JM and more definite perception of the 5D object.
After a single frame of conscious perception, you can "copy and paste" that process that generated the single frame of conscious perception. Doing so, allows many frames of conscious perception in a row, so you can sense the imagined object for a longer and more convenient duration than 50 ms.

The image above,
from Chapter 6, shows basically the same part of the process, but it shows the oneiric object occupying a portion of physical space. It is visualized there. The
previous former images showing
the brain were more about sensing the 5D object
more generally, like feeling the 5D object having a (possibly invisible and proprioceptional-only) form and existence
somewhere: like feeling some amount of pressure or a hunch that the 5D object exists, not necessarily seeing it -- although
in the image above: definite
visual Qualities and
a specific (3D spatial, 4D persisting) definite location are given to the 5D object - (not just moodal pressure (
Discontentment) that the 5D object exists somewhere).

This image from
Chapter 6, shows a 5th JM, having variations available for perception. The variations can be spatial, such as the 5D object moved/rotated around into other locations
in 3D space. The variations can be temporal, such as by rotating the 5th JM
in 5D for large skips in time between disparate 4D memories or 4D anticipations (the 4D overlapping cross-sections) -- or by moving/rotating the 5th JM
in 4D for more local parsing in
local time, such as the 5D object as it was 5 seconds ago or (by parsing 3D cross-sections of) how it is anticipated to be 5 seconds in the future.
If you move (instead of rotate) the 5th JM in 5D, you can change its emphasis, or moodal weight -- meaning that you can move it in 5D, to behind the physical space it occupies, to make the imagined object disappear. Like moving your physical hand behind some physical object to hide your hand, or putting your hand behind you to hide your hand -- except this would be done in 5D, so the imagined/oneiric and physical objects can occupy the same 4D space and time (and likely energy) -- and in this way, you can alternate or switch between oneiric and physical views (and between various 5D-concurrent oneiric views).
Objects in regular
physical perception can be overlaid with a positive gestalt that is a
5D positive gestalt. This allows physical objects to gain or lose emphasis (or moodal weightiness, affecting your
Discontentment and Contentment) within your focus, consciousness, coe.
For example: physical objects that are in your vision, but that are not as important to your focus as other objects that in your vision, tend to "disappear". They can then "(re-)appear" (even though they were previously ignored visible physical objects) when you put focus or importance on them (a potential moodal weight, allowing the physical Qualities overlaid by that 5D gestalt to have the power to change your mood more).

In the above image, also from
Chapter 6, it shows a 5th JM can technically have multiple curls, each from an overlapping 4D cross-section. However, the only curl of the 5th JM that is currently interacting with OSP, is the one perceived. You could think of the other curls of the 5th JM, as being on the "backside" of the 5th JM, or "the 5D backside" of a 5D object. As stated formerly, they would be "behind" in 5D, even if
just barely "behind" and still connected in 5D as in the case of a 5th JM, and so would not yet be perceived, although in a 5th JM they would
nearly almost be perceived as a kind of contributing pressure or a fuel to contribute to the structure of the 5th JM as a 5D object. (Like how part of a contiguous 3D mass that is unseen because it is behind the front face, still can contribute to the overall weight of the 3D object.) Especially as a 5th JM "rolls" in the conic path (a "conicity") as it continues in OSP's timeline.
The multiple curls of the 5th JM can be thought of as 5D cross-sections overlap-able with potential or future/anticipatory curls, and so the conicity itself is a 6D structure. Anyways: these curls intersect to allow intersection of slight Qualic (or Quality-related) variations of the same concept, in current 4D experience. The variations can come from the other 4D experiences interacting with the current one - their overlapping.

In
Chapter 6, this image above was called a Signhedral. Each group of 3 Qualities represents the same concept in a special/shared positive gestalt, but variable by which negative gestalts and encompassing gestalts are around each unique group. Because each 4D cross-section was previously its own
unique experience of the
same concept in different contexts and settings. Each context and setting allows each group to have its own unique 3D (and 4D) encompassing gestalt, which can remain unshared with the other groups - or it
could be shared or "given to" OSP and current perception, as a sort of special positive gestalt that was
shifted relative to one or both encompassing gestalts (those being the current physical encompassing gestalt and a unique encompassing gestalt of the "5D variant" in the 5th JM).
For the above image, notice that most each group of 3 Qualities is the same, representing the same concept; a Signhedral doesn't have to have all the groups of Qualities be the same; it can have some groups be slight variations of the same concept, such as the same object having different Qualities due to being shown at a different angle or in a different brighter or dimmer light, or in a different posture or configuration. The thicker curved darker lines, of each group of Qualities, represents the moodal weight, of each group. This moodal weight (or 5th Jhanic Mass) can differ due to each different experience of the same concept, causing mood to change differently for each experience. And current mood can be manipulated ("Stagically"): Discontentent can be transferred (from the body or from elsewhere such as other people, places, items, etc.) to a Contentment-bound region of empty space, to "manifest" a 5th JM, discussed a little later in this post. The differences between the past and present moodal changes help for manipulating 5th JMs. That's in addition to the more ("Stagic" and locally temporal) spatial differences between moodal changes, sort of like manipulating yin and yang in Taoism.
The moodal weight is sort of like a 5D position (temporally positional when considering 4D also) &/or 5D mass, and is strongest or most dense at the "centroid". There can be multiple centroids of a single 5th JM, but we're sticking to the simpler case of a single centroid for now.
In 3D, a centroid is a 3D center of mass, sort of like a map showing where the 3D object is the most dense or has the most mass in available 3D perception. In 5D, the centroid is a center of a 5th Jhanic Mass, not necessarily the 3D mass of the object.
"5D mass" (5th JM) could occupy the same space and time, or could occupy very distant space and very distant time, but be near in 5D, and this "5D nearness" can be dense or thick, or the "5D nearness" can be thin and less massive, even though it is the same "5D mass" just with different 4D properties. Especially because the 4D cross-sections can overlap in different ways, at different angles to and offsets from each other. 5D objects' ability to occupy various spaces and times are useful for the following.
Let's return to sensing an imagined or oneiric object. You could think of the time before you sense an imagined (or oneiric) object, as sensing "empty" 5D space for some 5D object that is not yet "brought in" or "manifested" to perception.
(A person in empty space)
(Empty space shown as not a part of the 5th JM)
Empty space of the physical distribution or moment-cube, is shown above, as being one of the "variations" of the singular concept (in this example, a red person) held by the 5th JM. If you consider the empty space's Qualities as just a variation (albeit a very different variation) of a red person, then that empty space becomes a part of the 5th JM. You could think of the empty space as the red person having been potentially there but vaporized retroactively. Or you could think of the empty space as the aura of the red person arriving into 3D and 4D perception before the red person themselves arrives. You can think of your own unique way that empty space could be a variation of the red person, such as a shadow on the ground being the red person's shadow, or any sensed Quality in that gestaltically designated region of space being somehow related to the red person. It's like (a game of) association, except
the Concept is the same, but the Qualities are different. In any of those cases, the empty space becomes a variation of the red person. Essentially, your current 4D experience also becomes overlapped with the other 4D cross-sections of the 5th JM. The (positive) gestalt, that you used to define which empty space was used, becomes a part of the 5D gestalt of the red person.
Your side of the 5D gestalt is positive to you gestaltically, showing the empty space to you there but connecting all the other 4D cross-sections to that empty space unseen. The 4D negative gestalts of each variation are then connected in 5D.
For example, you can then say: "This empty space is not variation 1's positive gestalt nor variation 1's encompassing gestalt." It's like you inserted your empty space's negative gestalt into or beside the variation's negative gestalt. This produces a tunnel effect: the negative gestalts can stack or branch like a traversable tunnel (sequentially trying out other variations, but not necessarily a straight tunnel, since tunnels can also branch and loop). The other negative gestalts of the other variations of the 5th JM can also be connected: "The empty space is also not variation 2(/...)'s positive gestalt nor variation 2(/...)'s encompassing gestalt."
I call this a "negative gestaltic tunnel" because (usually sequentially) you can use the 5D positive gestalt to then switch between which 4D variation's gestalts you want to put into your empty space, once the 5th JM is connected to that empty space, initially.
Here are some images from
Chapter 6. This is a single 4D experience or 4D cross-section. The positive gestalt is in blue. The negative gestalt is the sheath shown around the blue positive gestalt. The cube made of dashed/dotted lines represents the (3D) encompassing gestalt.

This is another different 4D experience or 4D cross-section. Notice the differences like the hat and the duck.
This is an overlap of the 2 4D cross-sections to make a 5D structure. In this view, the two positive gestalts overlapped to make a shared ("special") positive gestalt for them both. They have different encompassing gestalts each.
In this view, the 4D experience with the duck is at the "5D front". The other 4D experience is fainter or more disappearing, and in the "5D back". The two negative gestalts of both 4D experiences are stacked so that coe/focus can move into the other encompassing gestalt or allow the 4D positive gestalt in the "back" to be "moved up" in 5D, to the "5D front". Doing so would probably
replace the Qualities of the physical positive gestalt (the one with the duck) with the oneiric positive gestalt. It's like moving coe from the "5D-front" positive gestalt, past or over the shared/stacked negative gestalt (moving sequentially like a tunnel), and into the "5D-back" positive gestalt.
5th JMs can include multiple cross-sections that are in many different 3D and 4D and 5D angles and offsets to each other.
Combining this process with multiple 5th JMs helps you choose shapes and colors from various concepts to imagine what you want, in a quicker way, because you are using variations of what you already experienced, in a creative combinations.
And the 5D encompassing gestalt of that (gestaltically-defined) empty space can include all the negative and encompassing gestalts of each red person variation's overlapping 4D cross-section. This includes all the red person variants' unique environments and unique contexts involved whenever they were converted into memory, or into anticipation. Whatever happened to be around during seeing the red person in the past, using the red person as an access into other parts of those memories (and into other parts of anticipations).
This is all basically like saying: "the red person is not here now, but what if there were a variation of a red person in front of me, but he/she was invisible and not yet feelable?". This then allows you "grow" a variation of the red person into that empty space,
using the techniques from Chapter 7 and
using various rotations by Stagic techniques across Conektor
complexes (and I can describe later what Stages (each Stage is sending a portion of consciousness, or coe, in a technical way
into an animalian direction) and Conektor complexes are) to rotate (and move/offset) the 5th JM in 5D+, giving more available views of other variations of the red person that are in the 5th JM (changing moodal weight between them relative to OSP/the physical timeline).