If you're wondering why the previous blogpost was about crows more than about lions, then this post is for you!
Since angles are being discussed, specifically "4D" angles (also called animalian directions, or angle+'s), at least some two distributions are considered.
Therefore, it may be difficult to talk about a "4D" angle from a perspective of a single distribution.
"2D" angles must consider two or three "2D" locations or coordinate points so that an angle can be perceived and formed.
Some "3D" angles don't necessarily need to consider 3 or 4 locations in "3D" space because some "3D" angles may use the same planes for their lines, so that they look like "2D" angles inhabiting "3D" space.
For other "3D" angles, 3 or 4 separate "3D" points can be considered.
Disregarding the vertex for now, is like saying "2D" angles can have 2 lines, and "3D" angles can have 3 lines, and "4D" angles can have 4 lines. Technically, there is also the vertex to consider, but in the ideas in these blogposts, dealing with angles from an arbitrary perspective of consciousness (and so irrespective of vertex-originations such as at an originating sensory point of the body), the vertex is an arbitrary point on the observing or foreacting consciousness. So then, placement of vertex can be somewhat ignored until a later blogpost about Transitional Subbody. (You can read general summaries of subbodies in a previous blogpost.)
So couldn't it be said that a "4D" angle can have 4 lines?
But if only "3D" spatial coordinates or "3D" points are used in this model, then where can we put the 4th point? Remember at the beginning of this blogpost, when 2 distributions are considered for "4D" angles? And remember in the previous blogpost, that sometimes momentary distributions can overlap (like a second distribution building on the first)? And it was implied that distributions can be offset from each other spatially-temporally-energetically (these three things are related). So, the 4th point can fit into the model, staying as a seemingly "3D" point, even though it is in "4D" space. This is like, before/above, when a "3D" angle could seem like a "2D" angle in "3D" space.
Doesn't this overlapping of distributions seem familiar from the previous blogpost? In this model, it is like what happens when "3D" content is foreshortened to display on a "2D" screen or page. But here, "4D" content is "foreshortened" to display on the "3D" model above.
From the previous blogpost about mirror points, it is obvious that both "3D" momentary distributions can have their own "3D" angle, and that these "3D" angles could be mutual reflections.
Notice how the forth line connects the two distributions, but the "3D" angles in each distribution don't necessarily connect (even if they overlap), like how an image and its reflection (in a mirror) are "connected" because one can affect the other (by "dragging" it). AND the reflection can affect the image, for example: when a person or animal looks into a mirror and changes their behavior because of the reflection that they saw.
Also, light can be reflected into other directions to send laserlight or spotlight or informational-light to somewhere other than the originating point/vertex/image. This is reflected energy/consciousness/coe or light in other directions than directly back to the vertex/image (for example redirected in "4D"). This may be related to how consciousness can be directed from one animalian direction to another animalian direction in a sequence or series, as described from the Deity to Job.
If it takes effort / energy to send coe or some amount of consciousness into another angle+ (4D+ angle), to observe or affect it by producing some "3D" angle in the second distribution, then it makes sense that the lowest effort or energy possible for this process, would be to produce a reflection, or exact reflection, because as little information or data is changed during the process as possible. Like a copy without changing any data about the copy.
Although this process depends on the 4D+ angle which reflects, like how the reflection from a mirror takes little energy to affect a distant space's sensory data back to self, but depends on factors of the mirror like: distance, angle, shape, size, obstructions in the space between, changes to any of these factors, etc.
Notice how in the above model, the angles are facing each other as like a reflecting from a mirror mutually, so it displays "3D" reflected angles, BUT this is not necessarily how a "4D" reflection has to be. A "3D" reflection likely is not necessarily always accompanying a "4D" reflection. So, the model could show an angle with a "4D" reflection but not a "3D" reflection.
Now the model above shows the same angle, unreflected in "3D" space, but it's still reflected in "4D". Or a "foreshortened" "4D", because it shows spatial difference in "3D" distance between distributions, as "4D" distance/depth. And the model lacks temporal data and energetic data.
But there you go. There's more temporal data for this model (haha). Now it's starting to look like a short row of cubes, more like a row a cubes from the previous blogpost. Albeit it's a short curving row of cubes, but that idea was also in the previous blogpost.
There is more than one word that is translated as lion, in the Bible. Interestingly, four different words can mean lion in the Book of Job. These four words may be each a different type of lion. However, as far as I've studied, in the list of animalians spoken by the Deity, only two lions were used, לביא and כפר (written in plural form as כפירים ).
Now, if two animalian directions are considered (like Crow and Lion), then that means at least 3 distributions are considered. Because "4D" angles seem to be between two distributions, as it was implied at the beginning of this blogpost. We are considering 2 animalian directions PLUS the distribution that the person or consciousness "is in now" or "starts off in" or "the present distribution", or "the "4D" direction you're currently facing" (also referred to as OSP or "Ordinary Samadhi of the Present").
If three distributions (A,B,C) are considered, perhaps in energetic order of lowest to highest energy, or in temporal order of past to present to future, or in spatial order of behind to center to ahead, then there are two related 4D+ angles (angle+'s).
This is the first related "4D+" angle between these distributions.
This is the second. The two related 4D+ angles are related by the central distribution.
If the above model omits displaying a third distribution, and only implies its existence (perhaps in an implied extension of a row, spatially-temporally-energetically), (then) variations of available animalian directions may look like these:
If the animalian directions are the angles shown in yellow, between the fourth line of the two distributions, and also the fourth line between a distribution and some implied other distribution, then why are there four? And why are two animalian directions the same angle, but from a different perspective? The Deity mentions a mother or parent animalian and a child animalian. The animalians are the same (species) but they are mother and child of the same animalian. In verses like Job 39:4 and Job 39:16, the Deity mentions that in some conditions, the animalian mother separates from her children, or children separate from their mother. Even Crow (Uhreb, in Hebrew) has children which can act differently than the parent Crow (Uhreb), as described in the verses. The Ostrich has eggs and young in them. In other verses where the young of an animalian are not mentioned, there are pairs of animalians or something that pairs with the animalian and is related but can behave differently from it or can be treated differently by it. Or for some animalians, the young-adult relationship may be implied, such as possibly the description of the Ox/Rym not having calf, but Calf direction may be a viable angle that is implied or described elsewhere in the Bible.
You could read the book of Job and the gospels, and then use these models of adult-child animalians as related angles, shown above, to try to understand what the Lion direction is, and what the Crow direction is. Also check Psalm 104 for insight into Job 38-39.