Skip to main content

On the Accusation of Magic



I have heard an accusation of dealing with occult knowledge and magic. When I expose and research and make models and charts and compile and write descriptions of ideas, those ideas and concepts become less hidden to seekers of truth, and more available to everyone, to have as an option of knowing them and accessing and viewing them.


Then this is not occultism, and it is the opposite: a type of exposing of truth, or exposition.


When people say words and expect (direct) results, without their knowing or understanding how their words have any effect, if they blindly think without wondering how thoughts manifest or change an environment at their heart, nor learn in what ways those words may have manifested in their minds, then they are acting upon their own ritualistic power, and expecting results without knowing their processes. That seems more magical than my ideas.


They are drawing from traditions which they found or were given to them, sometimes in old books, sometimes in modern datapools of a page on the internet or on a phone-app receiving data wirelessly to it. And who knows if those sources of those traditions seed those traditional practices in them for benefit or for harm? People using wireless power to download ritualistic instructions, sounds like what? Like magic? This behavior practiced by many people in these days, seems more like they are making more magical decisions in their behaviors, using their traditional recipes of action unchecked, rather than decisions given much rational consideration.


More so than my attempts, which reach for rational understandings, some may call it a type of philosophy and science, aiming for understandings of the means of focus, concentration, changes to and of consciousness for causing useful or avoidable effects. This theory which is more like a science, like a psychology. My studies even relate well to natural biology and physiology and encounter ideas in neuroscience.


So before accusing someone seeking truth, and even writing their findings and theories for public viewing, of anything, please first read the books and articles here, and assess your own life and behavior. If you believe your own life needs some unknown powers of words and thoughts which are summoned by tradition, then ask if you rely on a sort of "magical" thinking or change or subconscious mode.


If you think these ideas are strange, consider that a major reason for this theory, is an attempt to learn how to do miracles from the Messiah's teaching. His disciples were called "mathetai" in the Greek, similar to the word "math". They were active learners, not called "sit-and-waiters". There was an active component to learning from Christ's teaching, and this teaching that could have provoked some people to falsely accuse Him and and His disciples learning and practicing (Matthew 10:25), and He taught that His followers would be able to do miracles too, as He did, and greater (John 14:12). I believe that we definitely should study Christ's words and example for understanding how to do miracles. This theory is an attempt to do that.


Popular posts from this blog

Chapter 7 - LWC Book 3 - The 6th Jhana

Post Under Construction 🚧  Click this for a post about  The previous Jhana  Click this for a  Post about Reconciling Buddhism and Christianity The Sixth Jh āna  ( viññāṇañcāyatana ): " And at this point it is said: “By completely surmounting the base consisting of boundless space, [aware of] ‘unbounded consciousness’, he enters upon and dwells in the base consisting of boundless consciousness.” In my theory, the Sixth Jhāna  involves: Placeholder text Placeholder text If you remember from  the last chapter , propriovisuality (PV): involved a 2D visual field that was modified by proprioception to make it 3D. Also in last chapter, the concepts of positive gestalts and negative gestalts were introduced. Let's attempt to combine these concepts. If you pretend to feel something in front of you, or in your hand, you are doing a technique known in Buddhism as "kasina". You can imagine feeling various things, but most things you feel will be groupe...

Sensing an Oneiric/Imagined Object

In the previous post , a conicity was introduced, with its parts described.  In terms of gestalts , you could think of a conicity like this: A 4D positive gestalt of perception is overlayed onto a 4D object in the kono side, shown in the above example image on the left side of the conicity. This makes more definition. The 4D object becomes more definite, because perception or positive gestalt is on one possible 4D object (like a 3D object persisting in time) out of many possible 4D objects. If the 4D object grows or rolls in the conic path, it can gain more 4D cross-sections and become a 5D object perceivable as a 5th Jhanic Mass, as shown in the middle of the conicity in the image above. There are 5D objects, that is, multiple overlapping 4D cross-sections, which are not  perceivable to vision, because there aren't enough 4D cross-sections yet - like a 5D object that is too small to see or sense because it doesn't yet have enough 5D mass.  You may think imagining an obje...

Motivation and Incentive

I've been wondering lately why there is so little interest in LWC Theory. I am highly motivated about it, and it seems to be partly because I believe in what is possible to do with it. Maybe I haven't described enough about the possibilities with the Animalian Directions. I believe there are specific powers related to each. Current Lack of Interest in LWC Theory Considered Two reasons for lack of interest in LWC Theory: a lack of belief in the Messiah's teaching and a lack of ambition. If people believed in the Messiah's teaching, they would read the gospels more often and more carefully. They might take notes or meditate on it. They would eventually produce ideas like LWC Theory, if not exactly like it. They would develop it into something exactly like LWC Theory, and would probably look around physically and on the internet for anything like it or anyone interested. They would then come across this website, my monastery's location on Google Maps, would ask around ...